The courts order came while overruling earlier

　　Whether video conferencing should be allowed must be determined on a case to case analysis to best effectuate the concern of providing just solutions. Khanwilkar in the majority verdict, Glue Guns Factory while Justice D.Y.In a transfer petition, no direction can be issued for video conferencing, said Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice A.

　　Far from such a procedure being excluded by the law, it will sub serve the purpose of the law, he added.After the settlement fails, if the Family Court feels it appropriate having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case that videoconferencing will sub-serve the cause of justice, it may so direct, the court added.The courts order came while overruling earlier two-bench order of apex court mandating the use of video conferencing facilities in matrimonial disputes before filing transfer petitions etc.M. In view of the scheme of the 1984 Act and in particular Section 11, the hearing of matrimonial disputes may have to be conducted in camera, bench added.